<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blizzard&#8217;s Real ID &#8211; Disrupting the (Ruby) Sanctity of Online Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://irnub.com/2010/06/blizzards-real-id-disrupting-the-ruby-sanctity-of-online-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://irnub.com/2010/06/blizzards-real-id-disrupting-the-ruby-sanctity-of-online-privacy/</link>
	<description>MMO Lifestyle, Insight, Debauchery, and News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:46:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prasy hydrauliczne</title>
		<link>http://irnub.com/2010/06/blizzards-real-id-disrupting-the-ruby-sanctity-of-online-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-50635</link>
		<dc:creator>Prasy hydrauliczne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irnub.com/?p=567#comment-50635</guid>
		<description>When someone writes an paragraph he/she keeps the idea of a user in his/her mind that how a user can know it. Thus that’s why this paragraph is perfect. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When someone writes an paragraph he/she keeps the idea of a user in his/her mind that how a user can know it. Thus that’s why this paragraph is perfect. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kreena Solanki</title>
		<link>http://irnub.com/2010/06/blizzards-real-id-disrupting-the-ruby-sanctity-of-online-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-24301</link>
		<dc:creator>Kreena Solanki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irnub.com/?p=567#comment-24301</guid>
		<description>Please, keep up the awesome work and continue to post topics like this. I am really fan of your blog! Non IM Riches</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, keep up the awesome work and continue to post topics like this. I am really fan of your blog! Non IM Riches</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blizztard</title>
		<link>http://irnub.com/2010/06/blizzards-real-id-disrupting-the-ruby-sanctity-of-online-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1001</link>
		<dc:creator>Blizztard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irnub.com/?p=567#comment-1001</guid>
		<description>and when i went to log into the old battle net i find a new ELUA in regards to them monitoring your messages? did i read that right &quot; MONITORING YOUR MESSAGES&quot; ? i think that is blatant invasion of my own privacy and i will NOT take for it.i didn&#039;t accept the EULA of course.and nor will i be signing up to them next month,and mark my words i will be taking a few people off their pay cheque&#039;s also as i pay for a few accounts.blizzard you suck and everything you have started doing is no less of a big brother bull crap scam.making people by forcing them to agree with the ToS is pathetic.what happened to i disagree as well as i agree? instead you have an i agree [] and that&#039;s it LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and when i went to log into the old battle net i find a new ELUA in regards to them monitoring your messages? did i read that right &#8221; MONITORING YOUR MESSAGES&#8221; ? i think that is blatant invasion of my own privacy and i will NOT take for it.i didn&#8217;t accept the EULA of course.and nor will i be signing up to them next month,and mark my words i will be taking a few people off their pay cheque&#8217;s also as i pay for a few accounts.blizzard you suck and everything you have started doing is no less of a big brother bull crap scam.making people by forcing them to agree with the ToS is pathetic.what happened to i disagree as well as i agree? instead you have an i agree [] and that&#8217;s it LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krieg</title>
		<link>http://irnub.com/2010/06/blizzards-real-id-disrupting-the-ruby-sanctity-of-online-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>Krieg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irnub.com/?p=567#comment-841</guid>
		<description>&quot;You can actually add others once the conversation is started.&quot;

I&#039;m glad you showed that to me last night. I had Prat installed and it was disabling those buttons so I was not able to see the option!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You can actually add others once the conversation is started.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you showed that to me last night. I had Prat installed and it was disabling those buttons so I was not able to see the option!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexian</title>
		<link>http://irnub.com/2010/06/blizzards-real-id-disrupting-the-ruby-sanctity-of-online-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irnub.com/?p=567#comment-836</guid>
		<description>I see what you are saying I was looking at it from more of a Mandatory viewpoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you are saying I was looking at it from more of a Mandatory viewpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vuo</title>
		<link>http://irnub.com/2010/06/blizzards-real-id-disrupting-the-ruby-sanctity-of-online-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>Vuo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irnub.com/?p=567#comment-822</guid>
		<description>&quot;Disregarding a few of my own security concerns, I think it is a really slick system. However, I did notice that when you, “create a conversation” aka a cross-server chat room, you can only have 3 people in it at a time, including yourself.&quot;

You can actually add others once the conversation is started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Disregarding a few of my own security concerns, I think it is a really slick system. However, I did notice that when you, “create a conversation” aka a cross-server chat room, you can only have 3 people in it at a time, including yourself.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can actually add others once the conversation is started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krieg</title>
		<link>http://irnub.com/2010/06/blizzards-real-id-disrupting-the-ruby-sanctity-of-online-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Krieg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irnub.com/?p=567#comment-817</guid>
		<description>After getting to play with Real ID some:

Disregarding a few of my own security concerns, I think it is a really slick system. However, I did notice that when you, &quot;create a conversation&quot; aka a cross-server chat room, you can only have 3 people in it at a time, including yourself.

Also, when you look at the &quot;friends of friends&quot; feature it only shows the person&#039;s real name, not their character&#039;s. I guess this is because they only want you to add a friend of friend if you know that individual personally. Otherwise, you really aren&#039;t going to have any idea who the friends of friend are.

Blacksen - I definitely agree with you that it is all about control and that seems to be the underlying concern of most people, including myself. Right now there are only &quot;birthday suit&quot; and &quot;formal dress&quot; for visibility options, there&#039;s no &quot;shorts and a t-shirt&quot; - if that makes sense.

Dexian - It would be no different than if several members gave me their numbers like they have in the past to call if they are needed--something voluntary that allows for a previously unavailable method of contact. Even the best players lose track of time or have events come up. As a GM your role is to organize, so communication is key. You definitely need to trust your players to show up, but contingencies happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After getting to play with Real ID some:</p>
<p>Disregarding a few of my own security concerns, I think it is a really slick system. However, I did notice that when you, &#8220;create a conversation&#8221; aka a cross-server chat room, you can only have 3 people in it at a time, including yourself.</p>
<p>Also, when you look at the &#8220;friends of friends&#8221; feature it only shows the person&#8217;s real name, not their character&#8217;s. I guess this is because they only want you to add a friend of friend if you know that individual personally. Otherwise, you really aren&#8217;t going to have any idea who the friends of friend are.</p>
<p>Blacksen &#8211; I definitely agree with you that it is all about control and that seems to be the underlying concern of most people, including myself. Right now there are only &#8220;birthday suit&#8221; and &#8220;formal dress&#8221; for visibility options, there&#8217;s no &#8220;shorts and a t-shirt&#8221; &#8211; if that makes sense.</p>
<p>Dexian &#8211; It would be no different than if several members gave me their numbers like they have in the past to call if they are needed&#8211;something voluntary that allows for a previously unavailable method of contact. Even the best players lose track of time or have events come up. As a GM your role is to organize, so communication is key. You definitely need to trust your players to show up, but contingencies happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexian</title>
		<link>http://irnub.com/2010/06/blizzards-real-id-disrupting-the-ruby-sanctity-of-online-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irnub.com/?p=567#comment-807</guid>
		<description>Oh and also, isn&#039;t a GM wanting to *keep tabs* on people an invasion of privacy in itself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and also, isn&#8217;t a GM wanting to *keep tabs* on people an invasion of privacy in itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexian</title>
		<link>http://irnub.com/2010/06/blizzards-real-id-disrupting-the-ruby-sanctity-of-online-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irnub.com/?p=567#comment-806</guid>
		<description>I agree, sometimes I just like to relax and be on an alt that nobody knows exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, sometimes I just like to relax and be on an alt that nobody knows exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psychosematk</title>
		<link>http://irnub.com/2010/06/blizzards-real-id-disrupting-the-ruby-sanctity-of-online-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>psychosematk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 23:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irnub.com/?p=567#comment-799</guid>
		<description>I kind of like it. I have people who play on other realms I&#039;d like to be able to chat with more conveniently on occasion, but on the other hand I don&#039;t like feeling like I&#039;m losing some sort of privacy. It&#039;s nice to play on an alt out of guild in peace w/o being bothered or leveling a secret toon, as i call em, when you just want to play in solace. It doesn&#039;t seem that will be as easily done now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of like it. I have people who play on other realms I&#8217;d like to be able to chat with more conveniently on occasion, but on the other hand I don&#8217;t like feeling like I&#8217;m losing some sort of privacy. It&#8217;s nice to play on an alt out of guild in peace w/o being bothered or leveling a secret toon, as i call em, when you just want to play in solace. It doesn&#8217;t seem that will be as easily done now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

